Board Thread:Actors/@comment-25828160-20160804211021/@comment-25375217-20160819033747

Uh, you can't exactly approve your own suggestion. Furthermore, we obviously aren't on the same page as to what this pitch is, since Matt said we're just raising the age limit, but you want to allow us to manage anything. And no one has chimed in yet. So...

I think that this would overcomplicate things. The way we have it now, adult actors are used with little thought. Once we make them manageable, we suddenly have to create look-a-likes for all of the adult actors already on the wiki. But once those actors exist and have managers, we now rely on people to start creating adult actors if we ever want to cast another adult role, but at this point most of our active users have already made as many actors as they want or can handle, which means adult actor creation would be slow and just make adult roles way too complicated to create.

That aside, I also fail to see how it's necessary. At this point, most people have stopped doing anything actor related - Chatter has effectively died, and most actors' pages are ridiculously outdated. People clearly don't care enough or have enough time to deal with the child actors, so why does it matter whether or not you can ignore the Chatter accounts of adult actors as well?